Response to article
Critical Inquires into Language in an Urban Classroom. By, Bob Fecho. Research in the Teaching of English. Vol 34. Feb 2000.
I believe that discussing the strength and power of language is very important to talk about, but sometimes it can be taken too far, and that is what I believe that the author of this article does. I don't know if it was just that I didn't agree with Mr. Fecho's point of view or if I just didn't read it the way that he wanted it to be read, but either way I felt it very difficult to get through the article. I think that it was a great how many other sources that he sited and how he really knew what he was talking about but I think that there were ideas that he overlooked. At the very beginning he talked about putting up a facade and how these students were doing this. I personally believe that putting up a facade in front of certain people is just something that we all do! This is almost a defense mechanism to defend ourselves from being judged, we always want to try to fit in. I think that this article was an ok read, It wasn't something that I would recommend.
1 Comments:
I'd be curious to know exactly what you disagreed with (where do you think he went too far as a teacher?) and how much of your resistance to this piece was based on the format in which it was written?
Judging by our classroom conversation, lots of folks had difficulty with the format, but it was appropriate for the venue of a research journal. Fecho would never have gotten this piece published in English Journal, though, because the conventions are so very different. For instance, offering specific strategies like Wheeler did is a must in EJ.
What a difference a venue makes! This will be important for you to think about, too, when you choose where you want to publish your final paper.
Post a Comment
<< Home